merig00: (israel)

.....there wouldn’t have been the type of news coverage that told us all about the John Gotti trial and his history of extortion and murder. Freedom of the press would be a thing of the past. No gang wants the truth told about them

There wouldn’t be the freedom to critisize the way they do things. Threats and intimidation and even murder would be the price you’d pay if you dared speak up

There would be no compromise. You’d have to follow in rigid lockstep with their dogma or accept a status as a second or third class citizen. If you wouldn’t or couldn’t become a “made man” you’d have to pay the vig, a tax just to live.

Your women would become property. Crime syndicates are notoriously male oriented, often to the point of mysogyny. A woman’s place is to do what she’s told when she’s told to do it. It can pretty rough on her if she doesn’t

The world wouldn’t put up with any of that if it were the mafia trying to take over, so I’m wondering just how it is that Islam, with its blatant thuggery and downright viciousness, is being allowed to bully its way into the lives of so, so many.

The Fitna film is just one of the latest examples. There is not a thing in that film that is not the absolute truth . Nobody made up those pictures of them standing there with those signs, nobody made up the horrid, inhuman beheading it showed, nobody made up the hateful preaching of their mullahs in the film. It’s THEM. It even quotes their own holy book that they use to justify their barbarism and yet in their usual way they’ve threatened to harm (meaning kill) the staff of Live Leak, one of the first to host it over here, if they don’t take it off their site. So they took it down

And that’s my point: If an organized crime syndicate did the same thing the entire might of U.S. and European law enforcement would come down on them like a ton of bricks. Will the threats against the Live Leak staff get the same treatment? Probably not. Islam gets a pass. I don’t get it

This is an incredible thing we’re watching develop right before our very eyes. Western civilization is being openly threatened by what is basically a murderous cult. They don’t even hide or attempt to hide their intention to destroy our way of life and to use murder, even mass murder, to do it. And. We. Do. Nothing. In fact, we do worse than nothing. We invite them into our countries, we offer them a standard of living - and freedoms - that would never be allowed in their home nations. And they unabashedly use those freedoms to preach their hatred of us. And we let them

We’re allowing an organized crime syndicate to dictate policy all through Western society.

The Islamists have discovered that their tactics work. Frighten people and they’ll do what you want. The train bombings in Spain are a great example of that. Spain immediately tucked tail and ran from Iraq. The Islamists won through mass murder. If Spain’s reaction had been just the opposite and they had sent divisions of troops to Iraq in response instead of running away the use of this type of intimidation may not be as effective as it is. And ANY nation that is similarly attacked or threatened with attack should do the same. Punch a bully in the nose and he quickly learns to leave you alone

Every website out there should host the Fitna film. And every country that is threatened should respond aggressively, forcefully, and with the clear message that if you don’t want to live here by our rules go back to those hell holes we’ve allowed you to escape from.

They’re afraid of the truth and things like the Fitna film is telling the truth.

And in their world telling the truth is enough to get you killed.

merig00: (israel)

Or "We pledge our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor"?

Here is LiveLeak's statement on why they pulled Fitna:

Following threats to our staff of a very serious nature, and some ill informed reports from certain corners of the British media that could directly lead to the harm of some of our staff, has been left with no other choice but to remove Fitna from our servers.

This is a sad day for freedom of speech on the net but we have to place the safety and well being of our staff above all else. We would like to thank the thousands of people, from all backgrounds and religions, who gave us their support. They realised is a vehicle for many opinions and not just for the support of one.

Perhaps there is still hope that this situation may produce a discussion that could benefit and educate all of us as to how we can accept one anothers culture.

We stood for what we believe in, the ability to be heard, but in the end the price was too high.

"In the end the price was too high" could be the epitaph of the Free West.

I understand their concern for their employees -- sure. The employees didn't sign up for this. But if Americans and Westerners and all people who are threatened by the global jihad and Islamic supremacism aren't willing to give their lives for this cause, then all is lost. Because the jihadists certainly are willing to give their lives for their cause. For them, no price is too high. And if any price is too high for us, then ultimately all we will have to pay is jizya.

merig00: (israel)
В честь слишком поздно убитого террориста Имада Мугхтния или как там его в Иране вышла серия почтовых марок "Мученик Имад - Миф Исламского Сопротивления"

Вот вам пару фоточек:

А вот этот плакатик висит в Тегеране возле посольства Кувейта после того как Кувейт сказал что департирует любого иностранца который выйдет на улицы в честь похорон Имада

Ну и куда же без молодого поколения. Да здравствует дедушка Имад!

Ну и напоследок... де жа вю? Где-то я это уже видел

merig00: (israel)
An exercise in discrimination at Harvard
By Michael Graham   |   Tuesday, March 4, 2008  |  |  Op-Ed
Photo by AP

What can a 19-year-old guy in jogging shorts do at Harvard that a rich Saudi sheik who sponsors terrorism can’t?

Get banned from the building.

Six times a week, Harvard kicks all the guys out of the Quadrangle Recreational Athletic Center at the request of the Harvard Islamic Society. This is to accommodate those female Muslim students whose faith won’t let them work out in front of men.

In the old days, Harvard would have laughed if some Catholic or evangelical mother urged “girls-only” campus workouts in the name of modesty. Today, Harvard happily implements Sharia swim times in the name of Mohammed.

At Harvard, that’s called progress.

When I asked Harvard spokesman Bob Mitchell about this new Sharia-friendly policy, he denied that they were banning anyone. “No, no,” he told me, “we’re permitting women to work out in an environment that accommodates their religion.”

By banning all men from the facility, right?

“It’s not ‘banning,’ ” he insisted. “We’re allowing, we’re accommodating people.”

The Harvard story, broken by the intrepid staff at Boston University’s Daily Free Press, is sadly par for the liberal campus course. U-Cal Berkeley is working on a joint program with King Abdullah University of Science and Technology in Saudi Arabia, which practices religious and sexual discrimination. The Archbishop (and arch-liberal) of Canterbury has called for Britain to accommodate Sharia law.

But despite stiff competition, when it comes to “allowing” anti-Semitism and the promotion of terrorist violence, the over-achievers at Harvard still stand out.

When John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt were looking for a place to publish their “beware the Jewish lobby” propaganda, they found willing partners at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government.

And who invited former Iranian president Mohammed Khatemi to speak on the eve of the fifth anniversary of 9/11? Who else? Not only is he a lifelong member of the murderous Khomeini regime, but Khatemi helped create and develop Hezbollah.

There are institutes of over-the-road trucking and schools of straight chiropractic that wouldn’t have allowed him on campus. But at Harvard, he’s an honored guest.

And then there’s that ultimate FOH (Friend of Harvard) Sheik Al Waleed bin Talal.

This Saudi sheik stroked a check for $20 million to promote the study of Islam. Harvard took the check, no questions asked.

They didn’t ask, for example, about bin Talal’s gift of nearly $30 million to a fund for the families of Palestinian suicide bombers. Knowing their kin will benefit financially is an inducement to young people planning to blow themselves up in Tel Aviv pizza parlors, and Sheik bin Talal made sure the money was there.

Nor did they ask about the TV company bin Talal owns, where the watchdog group MEMRI has tracked broadcasts of everything from open calls for martyrdom by children to lessons on the proper methods of wife-beating.

For a campus with a Sharia-friendly record like Harvard’s, mandating single-sex pilates is no big deal.

It would be nice to think that there were still a few liberals or feminists with the good sense - or sense of decency - to be embarrassed by all this. This is, after all, the same college that sued to keep military recruiters off campus over the issue of gay rights.

Perhaps someone in the bin Talal Islamic Studies Program could let Harvard know what the sheik’s pals in Saudi Arabia actually do to gay people. It’s worse than just banning them from the weight room.

Article URL:
merig00: (israel)
Тут попались на глаза две статьи из френдленты от хаверов [ profile] panikowsky и [ profile] lbertarian

В Англии всерьез обсуждаеться возможность многоженства

Статья о том, как, в свете роста числа иммигрантов из мусульманских стран, в странах Запада справляются с участившимся случаями многоженства.
Особенно пикантен вот этот абзац:

Concern about Islamic polygamy — whether in the West or East — has naturally been dismissed in some quarters as cultural imperialism. For example, Duke University professor Miriam Cooke argues that “polygamy can be liberating and empowering.” As Kay Hymowitz explains in City Journal, “Some women, [Cooke] continued, are relieved when their husbands take a new wife: they won’t have to service him so often. Or they might find they now have the freedom to take a lover. But, I ask, wouldn’t that be dangerous in places where adulteresses can be stoned to death? At any rate, how common is that? ‘I don’t know,’ Cooke answers, ‘I’m interested in discourse.’”

Критика многоженства - будь то на Западе или Востоке - естественно, отвергается в некоторых кругах, как проявление культурного империализма. Например,  профессор университета Duke Мириам Кук утверждает, что "многоженство может означать больше свободы, прав и возможностей.  ... Некоторые женщины испытывают облегчение, когда их мужья берут себе новую жену: теперь им не придется прислуживать ему так часто. Или они могут обнаружить, что теперь они вольны завести себе любовника".   На вопрос журналиста Кэй Хаймовиц, не будет ли это иметь опасных последствий  для такой женщины там, где женщины могут быть забиты камнями за измену, и насколько распространено это явление,  Кук ответила: "Я не знаю,  я заинтересована в обсуждении проблемы".

....и заодно что вот в Англии муслики потребовали расследования каких-то чипсов, потому что в них, понимашь, есть процент алкоголя. Очередной имам назвал это надругательством, и тд и тп.

Роджер выдал совершенно гениально простое предложение: добавлять алкоголь (самую малость) или свинину (теж) во все виды еды. Не нравится? Не ешьте. Вон хасиды едят свое кошерное и, ничего, не жалуются. Но можете представить себе шум, если с такой жалобой выступят муслики. А я – за. Если какой производитель будет наклеивать стикер «Данный продукт содержит спиртное» или «свинину». Роджер вообще предлагает сделать это законодательным путем. Как пишет он, «если Евросоюз может запретить какие-то бананы за то, что они слишком загнутые, они могут проследить и за обязательным использованием алкоголя / свинины».

Но нет, не пойдут на это капиталисты. Будут сидеть дома и мылить веревку.

PS Очередной наш историк лауреат аж двух пулицеров некий David Levering Lewis выступил с новой книжкой где он с нескрываемой печалью плачется о том, что как жаль что мусульмане не захватили Европу в средние века. Ну и так далее, типа это была более высокая цивилизация по сравнению с франкской европой, золотой век в Кордове, ляля тополя, стандартная либеральная пропаганда. Такие же Леверинги 50 лет назад друг с другом соревновались, кто больше на Конгрессы борьбы за мир съездит и кто смачнее Политбюро попу лизнет. Балласт наша интеллигенция, и никуда от ее не децца.

И еще РРS. (источник забыл) Провели какое-то исследование, которое показывало, что 3 из 4 мечетей в америке проповедуют анти-американизм. Не споря с результатами (наверняка эту методологию можно оспаривать), подумал: существенная разница по сравнению с «красной угрозой». Коммунисты (все 22.5) собирались в подвалах, и их разгоняли при первой возможности. А у наших мечетей полиция стоит, охраняет... есть у нас шанс, кто-нить знает?
merig00: (israel)

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israel said on Saturday it had recently seized a truck carrying chemicals used to make explosives hidden in bags marked as EU aid for the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip.

The army said 6.5 tons of potassium nitrate were in bags marked as sugar from the European Union for Palestinians in the coastal enclave.EU officials in Jerusalem had no immediate comment. The cargo in a Palestinian truck was traveling in the occupied West Bank and seized several weeks ago at an Israeli checkpoint, the army said.

The EU is the largest provider of humanitarian assistance to Gaza. Israel tightened its military and economic cordon of the Gaza Strip after Islamist Hamas seized the territory in a June war with secular Fatah.


Перевод по требованию....

merig00: (israel)

Это с волнений в Пакистане по поводу Датских Карикатур. Фотка взята с вебсайта журнала National Review: "Needed: Mature, Moderate Muslims" by Deroy Murdock. February 21, 2006. Так же она имееться на вебсайте немецкого ТВ канала. Ну и на вебсайте тоже лежит. Так что это не фотошоп.


merig00: (Default)

August 2017

  1 2345


RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 24th, 2017 04:56 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios